
Question: Do Earache have an opinion on the Pirate Bay trial currently going on?
From: paulscholesmanutd@hotmail.com
Answer: Earache is an Indie metal label, and I should point out, we are not a member of IFPI or member of RIAA, so Earache has taken NO part in the file-sharing lawsuits.However, we certainly have a lot in common with the larger Major labels because we too make a living from promoting bands and selling their music.Simply put-It's not cool to steal our music, we prefer so-called fans buy it at our webstores, and support the artists directly.Prices are damn low so why not?
The Pirate Bay is the latest showdown trial that the music Industry has been looking for, its a bit-torrent tracker, like many others before it, Kazaa,Limewire, Soulseek, but TPB seemingly went out of their way to antagonise any copyright-holders who politely-yet legally- contacted them for removal of their search results from the system.Of all the P2P/Torrent trackers, they provoked the most reaction from the industry because their responses to takedown notices has been downright hostile.

One look at TPB's top audio torrents chart (see pic ) shows that many of the major bands of the world have their whole discography available through the site,and also many of the Earache bands have their entire output available for free download- Carcass, Morbid Angel have 2 decades of work available on one click.The copyright-holder in me is annoyed, but the geek in me is gobsmacked at the ease of use, and the possibilities that it brings.
Just because its technically possible doesnt mean its legal.The problem is the young tech guys attitude to copyright.They cant stand it that someone else, labels, film studios, have a say in this, and seemingly gatecrash their wonderful plans.

We have dealt with tons of these tech guys,and its fair to say, we dont get on.They act like they are masters of the fkn universe, cos they have adapted some code that distributes files efficiently, and rent a server farm somewhere.The only thing they lack is the files to distribute- and that's where us content providers/copyright holders come into the picture.Its fair to say, we don't share the same world-view, we're not teenage hobbyists coding for fun, we would'nt mind the label and the artists getting paid for their music files actually.
One look at The Pirate Bay today confirms its covered in adverts for Poker sites and Dating sites, these are legit sites paying real dollar for the attention of the users.TPB simply have to share the ad revenue with the owners of the files to be legit, but that's seemingly beneath them.From their side, TPB cite their similarity to Google.com, they claim they are simply a torrent search-engine, which serves up the user search results, not the actual files.In many ways the TPB trial is a dress rehearsal for the big one- Record Industry Vs Google, Inc.
Fellow Swedes Spotify.com are using underlying bit-torrent software to distribute music, but they are clever and embraced the Industry.They have a snazzy interface/player and have struck deals with the major labels (and earache) to distribute the songs legally and paid for by occasional advertisments, maybe even a stake in the company itself.Though I imagine over time its the user data itself which has probably the highest value to future data-mining companies.


























